I found something interesting in my philosophy course at school. Of course the philosophy course is completely humanist and into mysticism; but I saw something about the Statue of Liberty being a symbol. Reading about it, and looking at its crown, I was instantly reminded by the Roman God of the Sun, Helios. He wears a peculiar crown in this picture. Tell me what you think and prove me wrong or right. Then add your own little idea and let it be refined. Here are the links to the pictures, mostly Wikipedia.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/eb/Nancy_Reagan_reopens_Statue_of_Liberty_1986.jpg

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/ca/Stele_Sol_Invictus_Terme.jpg

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/ef/Disc_Sol_BM_GR1899.12-1.2.jpg

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/8a/Antoninianus-Aurelianus-Palmyra-s3262.jpg

Supposed answers to the crown:

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20061110123632AAML5UJ

Just press Ctrl+F to look up Greek and Roman at the bottom of the page:

http://www.nps.gov/stli/faqs.htm

Besides, it was made by the French Frederic Auguste Bartholdi. He was born only 35 years after the Reign of Terror and had Orientalism written all over him. The statue, in later research, was not of ordinary woman bodies, such as the French rumors, yes rumors, suggest, but of the Roman Goddess Libertas. I know that Helios had a feminine side, but I don't know how to link it to Libertas. However, a plaque on the bottom shows signs of Freemasons. I found some more interesting stuff on this website.
Picture: http://freemasonrywatch.org/pics/liberty-plaque.jpg
Website: http://freemasonrywatch.org/statue_of_liberty.html
Please Reply

Here is another picture with Mithra(s) slaying the bull and Helios in the background. Surprising to find this in the Musei Vaticani.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Musei_Vaticani_-_Mithra_-_Sol_invictus_01136.JPG
That can prove for some type of connection between the two. Thank you Dr. Walter Veith, for reminding me of the phrygian hat and Mithra(s).

I was recently attacked on the internet by a man claiming that Christianity was wrong, and he started to give me several examples as to why the Bible was not scientific. One of his favorite topics was the age of trees. He claimed that the oldest tree was not 4800 years old but was in fact roughly 10000 years old. I dont know where this new fashion has popped up from, but he stated that the tree's environment was cooled by volcanic eruptions around the globe causing the rings to be extremely small. Not that the tree's rings were already small, but if anyone comes up to you stating this obscene remark against trees and their rings, you can tell them that(yes, the solution) if the tree was to be 10000 years old, then the world would have to be covered in ash for more than 50% of all the years of all the tree's life, making the rings generally smaller. Obscenely and dogmatically enough, he claimed this was wrong and then I countered once more saying that the world cannot have been in volcanic dust clouds for more than half of all history and any tree today does not have half the size of its original rings as any other year or one ring per year as to mesh to look like one ring because we still have seasons. If we have seasons, it doesn't matter that we have a volcanic eruption somewhere in the world, the difference between the seasons would still show the difference between the rings. I don't want to explain here how the earth wobbles on a tilt, but its warmer during the summer and colder during the winter, making a brown-spectrum-colored ring. Please post your ideas and allow them to benefit others. Thank you...

I never really thought of Google as being bad, but it was a mega corporation so I thought it might just have some Catholic links to its success:
1. World Humanitarian Day, fine and dandy, except that the first definition by Collaborative International Dictionary is: Humanitarian \Hu*man`i*ta"ri*an\, n. [From Humanity.]
1. (Theol. & Ch. Hist.) One who denies the divinity of
Christ, and believes him to have been merely human.
[1913 Webster]
In other words, World Atheist Day.
2. Google is totally environmental: Our Support for AB32 and a Clean Energy Future in California.... Not that that's a bad thing, it just relates to the Church.
3. Stephen Schneider is celebrated by Google for his climate change research after his death.
4. Believes in the U.N.(United Nations) which is in fact a tool used by the Jesuits and Freemasons.
5. Believes in a secular way of things, with no religion, no belief, and no opinion, God said he spits out lukewarm people and that sounds lukewarm to me. So I did some research, and they are either lukewarm, or they are a huge pawn to be used by the Jesuits.
I'm not "hating" on Google, in fact, I commend them for allowing me to find this information through their search engine. Just keep your eyes open. Please post any thoughts, ideas, or new stuff that you looked into, thank you!

Just saw this, too:
6. Google supports Hurricane Katrina with a black ribbon, sure, why not. The website for the meanings of the ribbons(black ribbon means mourning) has several ribbons for human rights including a gay ribbon which is the color of a rainbow. What I think is ironic is that the ribbons are meant for diseases and cancers... Are gay people a virus? Does Google support gay people? Is Google involved with the Catholic Church? Are you going to answer this with a thought or some research? Are you going to look at my blog or even my account profile and ask about avocado pie? Are you dead or just consider this a one-time video experience in which you forget all the stuff you don't like? Please respond, thank you.